CHAPTER
IINTRODUCTION
1.1 BackgroundToday
the political parties in Indonesia increasingly prevalent in the
community. This proves that the
political system in Indonesia has grown rapidly. In the history of Indonesia, the development of the
political system is experiencing ups and downs.A
political system is a container man and make participation in politics,
politics has been running a long time since the founding of the Republic
of Indonesia, this organization has existed even before independence,
most people assume that politics is an organization that is not healthy,
because it is expected through this paper we can know
clearly about the political system in Indonesia.
1.2 Problem formulationTo know the
purpose of discussion of the political system in Indonesia, then as in
the preparation of the formulation are:A. What is the political
system?2. Is the purpose of the political system?3. Are
the elements of the political system?
1.3 Objectives DiscussionAn activity would be more useful if it
has a purpose in this discussion include:A. To
find out if called by the political system.2.
To expand
the knowledge of the political system, both the goals, implementation
and political elements.3. Positive outlook on the future political
system that can participate in it.
1.4 Confirmation of Title TermsIn preparing this paper, I
gave the title "Political System in Indonesia" and the previous one by
one author will outline the terms of the title as follows:- The system is an entity
that contains the elements are bound together and organized whole.- Politics is a word with the status
of the territory to the preservation and development.
1.5 Systematics of the discussionSystematics consists of:CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION1.1 Background1.2 Problem formulation1.3 Objectives Issues1.4 Confirmation of Title Terms1.5 Systematics DiscussionCHAPTER II THE POLITICAL
SYSTEM IN INDONESIA2.1
Definition of Political System2.2
Structurea. Superstructureb. Infrastructure2.3 System in World Politics2.4 Dynamics of Political
IndonesiaThe Political Behavior 2.5 In accordance with RuleCHAPTER III FINAL3.1 Conclusion3.2
Advice, suggestions
CHAPTER IIINDONESIA'S POLITICAL SYSTEM
2.1 Definition of Political SystemIn
general, the political activities related to public purposes. It could be argued
that the political system is in citizenship activities to implement
these goals. "David Easton" argues that the political system as the
interaction abstracted from all social behavior that is ignored by
authorities nilah to the public. Politics is a central concept:A. State (State)2. Power (Power)3. Decision
Making4. Policy5. Division
Politics can also be interpreted as an interaction between
the government and society in the framework of decision-making process
and implementation.
2.2
StructureAccording to "Emmanuel Kart" is a
state of political structures and relationships of an organization that
make up the overall goals samsa.a. SuperstructurePolitical culture is represented by the
political dynamics in government, for example: State Institutions. Superstructure is set in
the 1945 Constitution. Political superstructure pemerntahan include: MPR Members
of the Board President CPC MA House of
Representatives and the President (Menjalangkan Legislative Power)
Out put function suprastructure
Decision making by the legislature and the executive Implementation of the decision by the executive and
bureaucracy Supervision of the implementation by the Judiciary
b. InfrastructureBelow the
level of political culture is a component that affects the capacity and
right to classify the residents. Infrastructure components
are grouped as follows:a. Political Party (Political
Party)b. Interest Groups (Interest Group)c. Political
pressure groups (Presure Group)d. Political Communication Mediae. Political figures
2.3 Political System IndonesiaAccording
to "Almond n Powell" can be categorized into three namely:A. Primitive
system of intermittent2. Traditional and modern systemsAccording to "Alfian" the traditional system are grouped into
four, namely:a. Uphold the authority ofb. Anarchyc. Democracyd. Democracy in
transition
Some political systems in developing
countries include:a. Traditional autocracy, namely: Good together The identity together The relationship of power
b. TotalitarianIe use force in
politics. Totalitarian can be differentiated into 2 of
the communist and fascist politics.By Carl J. Zbiegniew Freidriech and B is a hallmark
of modernist dictator has:-
Official Ideology-
Supervision of government- Monopoly media in control by the
authorities and parties- Centralized control over the bureaucracy- Kotrol tight against the
military
3. System of DemocracyIs a system that
maintains a balance between conflict and consensus. Only
mentalist who does not destroy the mechanism of conflict.
4. Din
system Developing CountriesThis
political trial and erras implement a search system that fits in this
system need to be a relationship that is casual and organic.
2.4 Dynamics of Political
IndonesiaIn a review of theoretical understanding of
politics is widely available. According to
"Hoogowerf" is a business man not only passively adapt to changes in
its environment, but by actively controls and directs the policies to
the people.Politics is a process
to determine and carry out the purpose of living together.Political dynamics of Indonesia is the
political struggle of the substance in human embryonal. Political
dynamics of Indonesia since independence until sekarangan terms of
development can be divided into several phases:A. Phase
of the war of independence (1945 - 1949)2. Phase RIS (1949)3. Phase of the Provisional Constitution
(1950 - 1959)4. Phase of political democracy (1959 -
1965)5. Phase of the new order (1966 - 1998)6. Phase of reform
If
a country wants a democratic government must pursue in order for HR to
become the state controller.
2.5 The Political Behavior Rules MatchPolitical behavior is the behavior of people in terms of
power. Basically
there are five reasons are:A. Want to get material2. To pursue
prestige3. Went along with friends4. Universal demands5.
In accordance
with the applicable rules
Political behavior is essentially
individual, this can be seen from the nature of the motion as follows:a. Radical
Political BehaviorRadical political currents in society
who want change drastically in order to get the desired goals. Characteristic of the radical is
more concerned with emotion than on rational so that the desired goals
materialize.b. Liberal Political BehaviorThis behavior is more priority in the fight for
liberty interests, but concentrated on the rules and always respect
human rights.
c. ModerateModerate the behavior as much as
possible to accommodate all interests and always avoid extreme behavior /
central group and this group maintains the principle of accommodating
and persuasive manner.
d. Political Behavior Qou StatusBehavior is to keep the power that had not
separated.
e. Reactionary Political BehaviorPolitical
behavior that is always put yourself in the contest with mass action,
although not done by force.
f. Conservative Political BehaviorIs a political stance
that wants a long tradition of stable and always avoid changes
radically.
CHAPTER IIICLOSING
3.1
ConclusionFrom the above papers can be summarized
as follows:A. Clear thinking about the political system and
respond to the expressed aspirations of the people.2. Can understand
and learn about political behavior in accordance with applicable rules.3. We can find some political systems.
3.2 Advice, suggestionsPossible from the
above conclusion can be drawn one of the most important is the human
need for Indonesia to have extensive knowledge in specific areas such as
citizenship field to professional thinking. Because in this
field to watch more.To the authors mekalah is far from
perfection and for the improvement of this paper I expect criticism and
suggestions. If there are errors in the writing language, or
preparation of this paper I apologize profusely.We expect the final words of this paper may
be useful to readers in general. Amien. . . . . . . . .
REFERENCES
Sudarso, H. , 2003. Political dynamics of Indonesia. London: The Eye
Issue July 1, 2003.
Syachrir. Of 1999. Structure
of Political Systems. New
York: Airlangga.
Friday, March 16, 2012
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment