CHAPTER IINTRODUCTION
1.1. BackgroundAmong the many
ancient relics in Indonesia, the temple is one of the most ancient type
of building society interest, both among scholars, tourists and ordinary
citizens. The
appeal of a temple for the ancient umumdan experts may differ in the way
of judging. To the public, the temple will draw
attention if there are elements of grandeur or beauty found in the
building. The beauty and splendor of this would be felt
if the temple is not in disarray, but has been restored. It would be fun again for the visitors of the temple,
especially for the layman, if prior to or at the time of visiting the
temple, for they are given little explanation about the ins and outs of
the temple they are visiting. For the purposes
of this paper that we presented to the general public who visit the
temple Jawi, one of the temples are located in East Java that has
recently been refurbished and inaugurated the completion of its
restoration by the Minister of Education and Culture of the Republic of
Indonesia.As we know, today in Indonesia have recovered hundreds of large
and small temples. It seems worthy of note that in all our land area of this vast
temple are found. Of the 27
provinces only temple in eight provinces have been found, namely: North
Sumatra (Padang Lawas), Riau (Muara Talus), Jambi (Jambi Estuary), West
Java (Cangkuang), South Kalimantan (Great Temple), Bali (Gianyar area) and finding that most are
located in three provinces of Yogyakarta, Central Java and East Java.
1.2. Problem
formulationRestriction problems in the
writing of this report are as follows:a. Is the real
meaning of a temple?b. Why a temple is
considered as a monument?c. Whether a temple
is a sacred building?
1.3
Research ObjectivesThe report is deliberately structured toa. Provide solutions to them what a beautyb. Knowing the advantages of a templec. To find out how a
temple manilai
1.4
Benefits of ResearchThe benefits of this research isa. As the material
knowledge of a templeb. For the reader or reading material as a student /
high school student PROSPER Prigenc. To prove that
the temple was very beautiful
CHAPTER
IIFRAMEWORK THEORY
Today in East Java is one among the
10 main destination regions (DTW) in Indonesia. In addition to archaeological heritage of the region
and surrounding Trowulan, the temple - the temple artifacts in Malang,
and surrounding areas such as Jago temple, Kidal temple, temple
Singosari, upgrading the temple, the temple Surowono, Jawi temple and
other objects merupan tourism potential in the area of East Java.
To find
where lies the temple Jawi is not difficult. When
we are in Surabaya, we headed toward the town of Malang keselatan. After about 45 km from Surabaya, we will arrive at
the city district Pandaan.
In this Pandaan there are two roads intersection. At the intersection of two roads that veer toward the
right (west) which is the road that leads to the small town that is
Tretes, this road that we should be aiming. At a distance of approximately 500 m from perigaan Pandaan we
will arrive at the park gate Wilwatika Candra and 200 m more in the
direction we're going to Tretes in Jawi temple that stands right on the
right side of the road. This temple belongs to the administrative area of the
village Candiwates, District Prigen, WordPress.
CHAPTER IIIMETHODS
This study used objective methods of experimental research. Methods of
experimental research objective is based on literature research methods
and an interview. Why is this study using this method because it not only
takes just a theory proves true fatherly and limitations issue, so an
indirect studies have also interviewed people who had tried to go into a
temple.
CHAPTER IVDATA ANALYSIS
4.1 Limitation ProblemBuildings
and artifacts from the Classical era (Indonesia - Hindu) famous general
public as the "temple" in Central Java, East Java, or cupola, and Biaro
in Sumatra, by the early archaeologists - initially considered a funeral
building. Understanding of the temple as the tomb was first - first raised by
Raffles in his book "History of Java" (1817)Raffles assumption that the temple was the burial place
diterma and later developed by the author - the author of the next such
as: Van Hoevel, Brumund, Leemans, Veth, Yzerman, Groeneveleldt,
Stutterheim and another - another.Dr. W.F. Stutterheim, a famous
archaeologist of the Dutch, who had led the Bureau of Antiquities in
Indonesia between the years 1936 to 1940. had
expressed the opinion that the temple is a monument to the cemetery,
where a king's ashes stored in a stone coffin (peripih) are then placed
in wells located behind the temple. Above the well (wells) were then set up statues
of the king embodiment forms adapted to the religious affiliation of the
king during his lifetime, whether Hindus and Buddhists. A growing belief that the past is that a king
is not human but a divine incarnation tertentu.apalagi king died, he
considered returning to the god penitisnya. Even
so, the people who are still alive still keep in touch with the king
through the medium of sacred buildings known as temples. So in
addition to the temple as a monument to the cemetery, as well as well as
building a shrine sacred to the people.If people want to make contact with the king
/ god, the ceremony was held in the temple worship. With certain ceremonies of gods found in
the temple will be "live" because the spirit of the king fell from
heaven every time "please come" in the ceremony.In terms of determining the function of the
temple of the ancient experts have differing opinions after the fact
that the reliefs that adorn the temple there is a story that "readers"
from right to left according to pradaksina (clockwise), in addition
there is also a must read from left to right according prasawya
(berlawanana-clockwise). Dr. J. L.A. Brandes
says that the temples are reading conflicting premises pradaksina
relief it must be considered profane building, or at least less
necessary in building respect, purity.Meanwhile, Dr. N.J. Krom where the department believes that
the rules which people must take if it wants to do homage around the
building (temple) since the time of Singasari have not addressed yet, so
if the order of relief against the pradaksina not a thing that has
meaning again.Both of the above theory archaeologist is not
approved by the Supreme Court, Musses, which says that all the temples
that require visitors to prasawnya is building funeral.Opinion that the temple is building the
cemetery since 1974 has been denied by Dr. R. Soekmono, which in
disertainya entitled: "Temple, Function and understanding", with
convincing evidence that he said that the temple is not merely the
worship building. Soekmono
further said that there is no evidence that in peripih stored in the
wells of any temple in Indonesia found human ashes. Habits of the Hindu
religion, as it is still growing steadily in Bali until today, when one
(king) died, his body was later washed away arau sea to the river. Habit of saving part or all of human ashes
in the temple or the temple that does not exist, as evidenced in Bali
today, the opinion of Dr. R. Soekmono.According kakawin
Nagarakertagama Jawi temple called java-java, sometimes referred to as:
dharma, temples, sucandi. According to
Dr. R. Soekmono
Further, Jawi temple is not the burial place of kings Kertanegara ashes,
but the place "pendharmaan" king of the mammal.
Jawi temple restoration
A. Principle
- the principle of restoration of the templeAs explained above that the temple
was not sartu found intact. If now we find there
the temple has been undergoing refurbishment by Oudheikundige Dienst or
Department of Antiquities.In
principle, the restoration of the temples or buildings of historical and
archaeological generally is "repair" the damaged buildings (collapse)
is usually caused by too old or lack of care.Building -
an old building in terms of architecture, religious background,
functions and other features representing its time, a source of
historical data (culture) is very important. Therefore, restoration of the building containing the
history, architectural characteristics typical of the region and others
nothing but the goal is to save the relics of historical or cultural
heritage of the dangers of extinction.Temple as one of
the very high heritage value including the dead kind of monument
building (building off), meaning that the building was no longer
functioning as originally constructed time / this means that the task of
maintenance, protection, restoration of these types of buildings
entirely the obligation of the government , in this case
represented by the Ministry of Education and Culture Protection and Development Directorate of Heritage and
Archaeology.Although
the restoration of the temple was the duty of the Government, does not
mean that all the temples should be restored. For the restoration of heritage buildings of
the temple or to follow a lot of requirements, among others:a. Each restoration of temples and archaeological
heritage and generally the results should be scientifically justified
both from a technical point of historical and archaeological.b. From a technical perspective, the restoration
should be guaranteed to last a long time to natural disturbances tens or
even hundreds of years, all restoration activities must be documented
in the form of maps, and photos bamgar as complete since before the
restoration until the restoration began, during the restoration lasted
until the restoration is over.c. In doing restoration should
use as much data as authentic the original building materials. The use of new materials as a
substitute for the old material is missing (broken) can only be
justified within the limits - the limits of archaeological technically
justifiable.d. Not justified to make changes shape, type
and quality of the original (stone, brick, etc.)e. If many of the original stone is lost,
then the restoration should only be done if the rock layers in a row at
least there is a genuine stone. If not, then the
restoration should only be done on paper.f. Before the temple is
restored, the arrangement must be made before trial, either on paper or
in fact. When the arrangement of this experiment was originally
thought to be true, then the real restoration can be done.g. If it turns
out in the arrangement of the experiment there is less evidence that the
original stone (lost) one layer let alone more, then the restoration
should not be made real.In terms of
implementation of the restoration procedures must be carried out after a
feasibility study which concluded that the restoration was feasible and
reliable in every way to be implemented. At - at least every
renovation must obtain written approval from the Directorate of
Protection and Construction Heritage and Antiquities, according to the
provisions of Ordinance Monumenten Stb. No. 238 in 1931.In conjunction with the restoration to the
rescue and protection of historical and archaeological heritage, the
restoration of the implementing regulations shall take into account the
international and regional such as: Charter for Conversation and
Restoration of Monuments and Sites ICOMOS established by the (1964) and
Recommendation SPAFA Workshop on Techniques of Monument Restoration
(1980) and others.Meanwhile, national provisions applicable is
that the implementation of restoration shall be in accordance GBHN
(Broad Outlines of State Policy) is to maintain and foster the heritage
which has national struggle, pride and national benefits to nurture,
enrich and idiom of the National Culture.2. Jawi temple restorationOf all the
provisions described above extent Jawi temple restoration has been
accounted for?. After
examining all the good virgin who proved that from a technical
perspective there are still good in the form of drawings, photographs
and other recorded in the technical report of restoration, it is evident
that the restoration of the temple Jawi can be accounted for. It must be admitted that a
technical perspective there are still some objections from our experts
enshrinement.The restoration of the temple was first
Jawi at the building still serves as a shrine in the year 1331 due to
being struck by lightning. Restoration
was completed in 1332, according to kekawin Negarakertagama.After the
temple Jawi is not working again a few centuries later, the building was
buried under the dust and then collapsed overgrown bushes, because no
one is paying attention or care for the population change since the
religion of Hinduism to Islam.The restoration of
technically qualified first archeology occurred in 1938 - 1939 by
Oudheikundige Dienst. To initiate restoration activities have
been carried out excavations of research to find the stone - stone
temples around the temple. In this excavation found the foot of the
temple, moat that surrounds the temple, statues - statues of Hindu
religion and Bugha. Excavations are still continuing in
the next year found the fence around the temple which shows that the
actual page Jawi temple was very large compared to the present. Courtyard houses in front of the
temple across the road right now (see attached picture).After the excavation of research, the
next activity is to hold a trial arrangement. Because the temple stones were found in
excavations in 1938 - 1939 was not quite complete as the technical
requirements for the restoration of the entire scientific Jawi temple,
which can be done at that time was only restoring the foot of the
temple. Meanwhile, let alone the rest of
the temple remains in the experimental arrangement.The fact that in the future many of the
stones of the temple Jawi layout experiment results are taken by
residents for domestic use, and based on a tip that there are many
stones of the temple are still buried in the ground, then at the start
of Pelita II (1975/1976) began the effort to rebuild the temple
Jawi. In a
study conducted excavations in early 1976 around the Jawi temple have
been found as many as 806 pieces of stone temples and as many as 39
other fruits found in the homes of the population that has been used for
the base with houses and so on.Attempts to conduct the restoration of
Jawi temple continued until in 1980 after a shortage of stone for the
full restoration of stone filled with new, because many of the old
stones are found to be incomplete and not strong enough to be used
again.At
first the Dutch, as has been explained above, this does not dipygar
Jawi temple until its peak because there are several layers of stone
temple of the body is not found. But the
restoration activities that take place between the years 1975 - 1980
based on image data that can be trusted accountability, temple stones
are missing that would represent each layer of stone was found. Thus the requirements of Jawi temple
restoration has been scientifically justified. And
restoration which has cost the entire amount of: USD 93,603,000.00
(ninety-three million six hundred three thousand dollars). Implemented
by the project of restoration and maintenance of Heritage of East Java
and implemented its own (self governance) with technical guidance dang
guidance directly from the Directorate of Protection and Construction
Heritage and Archaeology.In closing this brief account we would like to appeal to
visitors of the temple Jawi community in particular, objects of
historical and archaeological heritage generally, in order to preserve
the heritage preservation of the temple Jawi as our ancestors who have
succeeded with great difficulty we pugar back. By keeping our Jawi temple always looks neat,
clean, no scratch - graffiti or other vandalism of stones will show that
we are able to protect the safety of the cultural heritage of our
forefathers should be proud of.
CHAPTER
VCONCLUSION
Of
all kinds of relics in the form of an ancient temple that can be
classified is a unique, why because of rather than in terms of shape and
the existence of a temple that could be considered attractive may also
pass such stories of the kings in ancient times.From here we
can know and learn the process of how and why could such a way or make
it. The existence of a temple in the world is a form of concord in
earlier times than in today for a temple is one can judge a beauty such
as terms of art, creativity and the ancient craft is less interesting
than in this day and age all the beauties are tied in terms of appearance only.From all this we can pick a
lesson in how to assess the superiority of a temple of beauty and how
early is not good to be interesting to see and be seen.
REFERENCES
Coedes.
G. 1968: The Indiantzed States of South East
Asia. Edited by Walter F. Vella. Tranlated by Susan Brown Cowing East
West Center Press. Honolulu. p. 198-201.Direktoral General of Culture. 1980:
Technical Guidelines for the implementation of Activities. PTPK project.Directorate General of Culture. 1982 to 1983. TEMPLE
Jawi. Jakarta:
Directorate General of Culture.
Wednesday, March 14, 2012
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment